Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation, Washington, Wilkinson, Cragun & Barker, United States, United States. Indian Claims Commission, & Wilkinson, E. L. (1960). Before the Indian Claims Commission, docket no. 331, the Spokane Tribe of Indians, suing on its own behalf and on behalf of the Upper, Middle and Lower Bands of Spokane Indians or the Upper Spokane, Middle Spokane, or Lower Spokane Band of Indians, or any one or two of them alternatively, Petitioner, v. the United States of America, Defendant: Reply to defendant's objections to petitioner's proposed findings of fact, objections to defendant's proposed findings of fact, and reply brief. s.n..
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationSpokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation, Washington, Cragun & Barker Wilkinson, United States, United States. Indian Claims Commission, and Ernest L. Wilkinson. Before the Indian Claims Commission, Docket No. 331, the Spokane Tribe of Indians, Suing on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of the Upper, Middle and Lower Bands of Spokane Indians or the Upper Spokane, Middle Spokane, or Lower Spokane Band of Indians, or Any One or Two of Them Alternatively, Petitioner, V. the United States of America, Defendant: Reply to Defendant's Objections to Petitioner's Proposed Findings of Fact, Objections to Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact, and Reply Brief. [Washington: s.n., 1960.
MLA引文Spokane Tribe of the Spokane Reservation, Washington, et al. Before the Indian Claims Commission, Docket No. 331, the Spokane Tribe of Indians, Suing on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of the Upper, Middle and Lower Bands of Spokane Indians or the Upper Spokane, Middle Spokane, or Lower Spokane Band of Indians, or Any One or Two of Them Alternatively, Petitioner, V. the United States of America, Defendant: Reply to Defendant's Objections to Petitioner's Proposed Findings of Fact, Objections to Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact, and Reply Brief. s.n., 1960.