Missile defense some progress delivering capabilities but challenges with testing transparency and requirements development need to be addressed
"Since 2002, MDA has been developing a Ballistic Missile Defense System comprised of a command and control system, radars that can identify incoming threats, and intercepting missiles. MDA has received approximately $123 billion and is planning to spend an additional $37 billion through fiscal year 2021 to continue its efforts. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 included a provision that GAO assess the extent to which MDA has achieved its acquisition goals and objectives. This report addresses the progress and challenges in fiscal year 2016 associated with MDA: (1) achieving fiscal year 2016 testing, asset, and capability delivery goals, (2) ensuring transparency of test schedules and costs, and (3) establishing a sound business case for future efforts. GAO reviewed the planned fiscal year 2016 baselines as stated in the BMDS Accountability Report and other program documentation and assessed them against program and baseline reviews and GAO's acquisition best practices guides. In addition, GAO interviewed DOD and MDA officials"--Preliminary page.
Holdings -
Format: | Government Document Electronic eBook |
---|---|
Language: | English |
Published: |
[Washington, D.C.] :
United States Government Accountability Office,
2017.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo81644 Address at time of PURL creation Resource homepage |
MARC
LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 640755 | ||
005 | 20190307125800.0 | ||
006 | m o d f | ||
007 | cr mn||||||||| | ||
008 | 170602s2017 dcua ob f000 0 eng c | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)988774570 | ||
040 | |a AWC |b eng |e rda |e pn |c AWC |d GPO | ||
042 | |a pcc | ||
043 | |a n-us--- | ||
049 | |a UAGA | ||
074 | |a 0546-D (online) | ||
086 | 0 | |a GA 1.13:GAO-17-381 | |
088 | |a GAO-17-381 | ||
092 | 0 | |a ELECTRONIC | |
110 | 1 | |a United States. |b Government Accountability Office, |e issuing body. | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Missile defense, some progress delivering capabilities, but challenges with testing transparency and requirements development need to be addressed |h [electronic resource] : report to congressional committees. |
246 | 3 | 0 | |a Some progress delivering capabilities, but challenges with testing transparency and requirements development need to be addressed |
264 | 1 | |a [Washington, D.C.] : |b United States Government Accountability Office, |c 2017. | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (v, 109 pages) : |b color illustrations | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a text file |b PDF |2 rda | ||
500 | |a "May 2017." | ||
500 | |a "GAO-17-381." | ||
504 | |a Includes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | 0 | |a Background -- MDA made progress in Fiscal Year 2016 conducting tests and delivering assets and BMDS level capabilities but it did not meet its planned goals -- MDA's testing schedule remains aggressive and associated costs lack transparency -- MDA incorporated several elements of a sound business case for its next generation efforts but concerns with requirements and acquisition strategies could hamper efforts -- Conclusions. | |
520 | |a "Since 2002, MDA has been developing a Ballistic Missile Defense System comprised of a command and control system, radars that can identify incoming threats, and intercepting missiles. MDA has received approximately $123 billion and is planning to spend an additional $37 billion through fiscal year 2021 to continue its efforts. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 included a provision that GAO assess the extent to which MDA has achieved its acquisition goals and objectives. This report addresses the progress and challenges in fiscal year 2016 associated with MDA: (1) achieving fiscal year 2016 testing, asset, and capability delivery goals, (2) ensuring transparency of test schedules and costs, and (3) establishing a sound business case for future efforts. GAO reviewed the planned fiscal year 2016 baselines as stated in the BMDS Accountability Report and other program documentation and assessed them against program and baseline reviews and GAO's acquisition best practices guides. In addition, GAO interviewed DOD and MDA officials"--Preliminary page. | ||
588 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF cover (GAO, viewed June 2, 2017). | ||
610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Missile Defense Agency |x Rules and practice |x Evaluation. |
610 | 1 | 0 | |a United States. |b Missile Defense Agency |x Procurement |x Evaluation. |
650 | 0 | |a Ballistic missile defenses |z United States |x Management |x Evaluation. | |
650 | 0 | |a Ballistic missile defenses |z United States |x Testing |x Evaluation. | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo81644 |t 0 |
856 | 4 | |z Address at time of PURL creation |u http://www.gao.gov/assets/690/684963.pdf | |
856 | 4 | |3 Resource homepage |u http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-381 | |
998 | |a 2017.06.23 | ||
999 | f | f | |i 3bcda8f6-8a7e-52d6-ae35-4d5c432bed0b |s f27621d3-e1f4-59e0-9418-ab3cd269ba53 |t 0 |